Amedeo, For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/ I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/ Are these not correct? Should I use only http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6? The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an example of setting up the repository channel. I found a YouTube video of a guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository. He used the first URL that I posted. Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6 a better method? Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated. Thank you. Daryl On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati <ame...@oscert.net> wrote: > > @daryl > did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like: > > /mirrors/CentOS/6.5 > > or you use generic 6 version? like: > > /mirrors/CentOS/6 > > both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor > release will empty updates directory on the last one > > best regards > a > > Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com > A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com > Cc: > Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100 > Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date? > > > Daryl Rose wrote: > > % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a > > % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client > server > > % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server. > > % > > % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how > many > > % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264 > > % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then > > % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see > if > > % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is > > % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why? > > > > So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in > Spacewalk. > > And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't > accurate? > > > > If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know > about updates. > > > > % Thanks. > > % > > % Daryl > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Michael Mráka > > Satellite Engineering, Red Hat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spacewalk-list mailing list > > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list