On Monday 05 January 2004 04:37 CET Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:59:25PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > The spamd directory gets a bit messed up, especially with Sidney's
> > files getting added. spamd and spamc are twe separate applications
> > (even though they communicate with each other), each one's got it's own
> > accompanying files (the one it's headers, the other the rc scripts
> > etc.) and both are built completely different.
>
> I agree. If anything, I'd argue that spamc should be its own top level
> directory if not entirely separate from the spamassassin
> distribution.... Certainly it should be build independently.
>
> > What do you think about creating an own directory for spamc and move
> > all related files (including qmail-spamc.c) there? (Moving files is
> > very easy with SVN, I really love it :)
>
> Please :-)
Any other opionions? Vetoes? Justin, Theo, Daniel, what do you think?
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
