-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
"Malte S. Stretz" writes: >On Monday 05 January 2004 04:37 CET Duncan Findlay wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:59:25PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: >> > The spamd directory gets a bit messed up, especially with Sidney's >> > files getting added. spamd and spamc are twe separate applications >> > (even though they communicate with each other), each one's got it's own >> > accompanying files (the one it's headers, the other the rc scripts >> > etc.) and both are built completely different. >> >> I agree. If anything, I'd argue that spamc should be its own top level >> directory if not entirely separate from the spamassassin >> distribution.... Certainly it should be build independently. >> >> > What do you think about creating an own directory for spamc and move >> > all related files (including qmail-spamc.c) there? (Moving files is >> > very easy with SVN, I really love it :) >> >> Please :-) > >Any other opionions? Vetoes? Justin, Theo, Daniel, what do you think? +1 -- move away. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFABIEnQTcbUG5Y7woRAgtiAJ4rL6mIJqycvFsasqLlt8KfNTnM9ACgpQlb apW2X5LFC88tUDqh1wQ2GEY= =K4NH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
