On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 02:10, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Sunday 15 February 2004 22:49 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:43:32PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > > > How do we exchange the patches? Bugzilla, personal webspace, rsync? > > > > Bugzilla. Attach as usual in R-T-C mode. :) > > > > (R-T-C is "Review then Commit" for those who didn't know the acronym ... > > vs C-T-R which is "Commit then Review"...) > > Hrm. As if there weren't enough acronyms around ;-)
heh heh, you'll get used to it ;) :) > Another very important point: Can somebody please update the (Bugzilla) list > of received CLAs till Wednesday? What kind of list do you want, specifically? It would be most convenient to have a list of names of contributors (sorted by last name), you need to know you have a CLA on file for. Any ASF member can then fill in a Yes/No to whether there is a CLA on file. > Cheers, > Malte > > P.S.: The current CLA-handling is pretty suboptimal and slows down the > contribution process very much. Somehow this got to be improved. The new license should help a great deal. I suggest you process patches as they come in. Make the contributor aware of the terms. If you prefer a CLA, because it feels safer, just note the names/email of the contributor you accepted a patch from, but don't have a confirmed CLA for yet. What matters is if the code is covered at release time. As for the CLA-handling. There is work on the way to improve things. But short term this isn't going to help you. Sander
