-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:44:30AM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > > It is supposed to, but it shouldn't sneak up on people. > > I think the issue is that to be a committer you need a CLA, so for > people who are putting in (potentially) a lot of code/rules they should > probably be treated as a committer even if they don't have the access. > Just a CYA maneuver. I suggest that if (a) the code is going into the 3.0.0 branch and (b) the submitter has said in a public forum (such as this list or the bugzilla) that they have already faxed/sent in the CLA, that's good enough -- since 3.0.0 is under ASL2, and that already has the implicit CLA clause. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAMnjyQTcbUG5Y7woRAtIvAJ0f8w2L8SsIaSunO1NA+/fylVVyjQCgiMQX m/ScELSoPSZa/Pvmr+L9SYU= =opFA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
