On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 17:28, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > Full -> Raw (as this really is the 'raw' message) > > Rawbody -> Decoded or RawDecoded (if this were just like the 'raw' message, > > but with decoded parts) > > Body -> Text (just to make it more explicit that this is the text from the > > message) > > In 3.0.0: > > body -> Text -- fully decoded and HTML rendered into text > rawbody -> Text -- fully decoded, but not rendered > full -> Raw -- the pristine message as passed to SA
Is this a suggestion or are these already decided upon new names? I would suggest that the 'body' and 'rawbody' parts be named differently from each other, rather than both being 'Text'.. :)
