http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-25 09:18 ------- >IMO, just use SPF. It's more "correct" than the above draft, and it >doesn't overload an RR (MX for instance) to mean more than it's supposed >to mean. Hmmm, where can I read abount SPF? I think, DNS requests will be cached effectivly... >> About 98% of spam flag on this test >> About 50% of ham flag off this test >So in short, the rule sucks...? No! It rule like AWL, like good whitelist - it very effective, may be we shold revert flag and assign score<0 (-1.6 for example) Can anybody perform learning on big corpus hams and spams? I think this rule will be in top20 best rules. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
