http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-26 00:17 ------- >We'll implement this if it picks up steam and seems to be >what the world is going to gather around as a standard for sender verification. >I think SPF or a follow-on to SPF is much more likely to take hold. Are you shure that SPF going to be standard for sender verification? NO_MX_FOR_FROM effective now and more effective that implemented SPF. Because many servers not use SPF, but checked ok though NO_MX_FOR_FROM NO_MX_FOR_FROM is heiristic that work now. If it will be standard - I will reject emails on MTA header checking ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
