http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spamassassin-
| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AssignedTo|spamassassin- |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-11 09:15 -------
I've started working on this, and have most of it done. A few
questions/comments, if anyone sees a problem with assumptions of design
decisions feel free to speak up.
1) Does adding a new command mean that we need to bump the protocol version?
2) My thinking is to add a LEARN command to the protocol and then a Learn-Type
header that can contain ham/spam/forget (more likely some numerical value that
represents each of them).
3) You can call spamc with -L <type> (ie spamc -L ham < hammsg.txt, spamc -L
spam < spammsg.txt or spamc -L forget < somemsg.txt). -L == learner, but I'm
open to better options.
4) What should the LEARN command return to spamc to indicate
success/failure/already learned/etc?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
