http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-14 05:15 ------- >>1) Does adding a new command mean that we need to bump the protocol version? >nope IMO. it should be possible to detect the "protocol error" returned >when a new verb is attempted against an older spamd, and fail with an >error. +1 >>2) My thinking is to add a LEARN command to the protocol and then a Learn-Type >>header that can contain ham/spam/forget (more likely some numerical value that >>represents each of them). >+1 +1 If you need some testing, let me know how i can help! Greetings NicoP. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
