http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-11 14:41 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >1) Does adding a new command mean that we need to bump the protocol version? nope IMO. it should be possible to detect the "protocol error" returned when a new verb is attempted against an older spamd, and fail with an error. >2) My thinking is to add a LEARN command to the protocol and then a Learn-Type >header that can contain ham/spam/forget (more likely some numerical value that >represents each of them). +1 >3) You can call spamc with -L <type> (ie spamc -L ham < hammsg.txt, spamc -L >spam < spammsg.txt or spamc -L forget < somemsg.txt). -L == learner, but I'm >open to better options. hmm. what about emulation of sa-learn somehow? I suppose we'd need long options... >4) What should the LEARN command return to spamc to indicate >success/failure/already learned/etc? Header: value pairs, I'd suggest. more extensible. Also use the HTTP-style status line and status code. - --j. >------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. >You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAyicIQTcbUG5Y7woRAqejAKDLZvEoIpuV9XPmBDHLQmZu8a5kDQCg2CV3 S/n4uQddWLTULE6tlI81Y0M= =AhxA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
