"Ralf Vitasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > No need to get confrontational. Two weeks ago (2/23/2004) when I > > wrote that, I *hadn't* seen any in weeks. And given that it took > > two weeks for anyone to post a sighting (dated today, I noticed), it > > sounds like no one else had either. > > > > So it's started up again. Has anyone contacted Habeas about this? > > i think it hasn't ever really stopped since back then. > > but most of us adjusted the score to ignore the habeas marks. i found > a couple of habeas spams in trashcan. but beside the habeas mark > they're nothing but common dumb blue pill advertising mails that > trigger scores 20-30 points here which would catch them even with the > -8 points from the standard rule. I set up some post-Spamassassin filtering rules to flag spam that contained the Habeas watermark and I haven't seen any between the initial fuss a few weeks ago, and a few I've had in the last couple of days. Looking at the subjects, I would say that the recent ones are from the same source as the first lot. Cheers, John
