On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, jdow wrote: > I am ready to run their score up positive 1 or so. On one hand Their > logic is faulty, I believe - unless they are spammers. I know very > few people who are able to manipulate headers in such a manner as > to insert the Habeas headers. Most of my correspondents use "stock" > mailers like Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, etc. None of these, > to my knowledge, can add the Habeas X headers. On another hand I > note that spammers for the most part do forge headers. for them > adding the Habeas mantra is duck soup. On the gripping hand this > means that ISP's mail servers must add that header for most users > which is something they are simply not going to do.
Any body who is stuck on Outhouse Expressed is write-off as far as I'm concerned. For those other mail clients that you mentioned, just go to: http://habeas.com/supportConfiguration.html and -READ-. There you will find header imbedding instructions for those clients and more than a dozen others. Half of being computer literate is being literate. If you cannot read the road signs (follow directions, read manuals) then you don't deserve to be on the information super-highway. I hope that this has increased your knowledge. ;) > Hence, it is an indicator of spam not of ham. > {^_^} Hmm, then why do some of the major posters to this list use it? -- Dave Funk University of Iowa <dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527 #include <std_disclaimer.h> Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
