The way I see it we should incorporate some other -8 or -10 checks into SA that are bogus. Then mark them up to positive 8 or 10 in your sa.conf once you install.
Hirotaka Fox
Owen wrote:
I for one give Habeas a + score.
I've just done a quick grep -l of Habeas from my Maildir, and here's the results.
Spam folder : 82 mails
Inbox : 0 mails
spamassassin folder: 150 mails (presumably everyone talking about it on the list, with one or two genuine users of it).
The spam folder is certified spam, with the ones containing Habeas having subjects like:
./spam/1959:Subject: [SA: 25.44] Fwd: Want V^|cod|n , Val.i.um ? V|@grA \ XA/N/Ax Pnt.e.rmin > So+m+a kdwfigegcunl ./spam/1968:Subject: [SA: 25.57] Fwd: +Valium+ ` v1agR@ ' :X:ANAx \ V|co:d|n So:m:a \ /Pntermin/ uiibchgtkyiv ./spam/2054:Subject: [SA: 27.11] Everything 4 U Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ v|@gRa - xana|x| ; V1c/odin S|o|ma ( P:n:termin dglvklfdydcr ./spam/2842:Subject: [SA: 20.12] Fwd: Get it all Vcodn ? xana+x+ # Val.i.um ` V1AGr@ So.m.a ' P.n.termin hpibvplqcroy ./spam/2871:Subject: [SA: 17.05] Hot Girl N Big White Dog ./spam/2873:Subject: [SA: 16.52] Fwd: Any Pills U Need. v|agr@ & XAN/a/x . Va|ium _ V|cod|n^ Pnt.e.rmin ) S:o:ma thpmjhmtawfp ./spam/2905:Subject: [SA: 16.29] Fwd: V|@Gra - |XANAX| = Vali/u/m \ V^|cod|n .P.ntermin ~ S0m@ owerewnvdrcz ./spam/2929:Subject: [SA: 19.83] Fwd: V1codi/n $ XA+n+ax ? V|agr@ ) +V+alium +S+oma ` Pnt/e/rmin wzxexbpyhmkg
It's worth noting that my inbox goes back to the 20th August, whereas my spam box only goes back to last Friday.
Owen
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 484444
