[OT] But do any of you heavy hitters use rules from SARE? We like feedback
from the big boys to make sure things scale well. Important feedback. Also
for usage in a hospital, that must make the antidrug.cf useless to you.
Which is something we are trying to work on. 

And yes....I have iron envy :)  I'm running a Dell 266 mhz desktop box with
128megs ram for SA! But she be running like a champ! *sigh* I need to work
for a bigger company.

Chris Santerre 
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Spam Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:07 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: System Sizing
>
>
>> Looking for some pointers on sizing a machine to run Spam Assassin
>on.
>> This server will be protecting 2 mail servers, one receives an
>average
>
>For reference, I have an SA environment that fronts a full GroupWise
>system of 16 servers, about 10,000 email users, and a peak 
>load of about
>5,500 emails per hour mid-day. Believe it or not, we're running this on
>a Dell GX270 *desktop*, about a 2.5Ghz processor, 512MB RAM, 40GB hard
>drive, SuSE v8 pro, Postfix, Amavis, SpamAssassin 2.63. It works like a
>champ, no clogging.
>
>In fact, when SBC's network in Connecticut got cut on April 26th and
>was restored, this box handled just over 11,000 emails per hour for the
>first two hours, and I saw very little email clogging...I was suitably
>impressed.
>
>Yeah, we've got better hardware coming in to replace it, just to make
>ourselves feel better (and for redundant power supplies, redundant
>drives, and more RAM) but I am totally happy with the way this little
>box has been working. This is my first foray into LINUX; unlike its
>predeccessor, a Windows NT box running Guinevere and SpamAssassin, this
>box has been up for about 8 weeks with *zero* problems, no complaints,
>and a lot of kudos for significantly reduced SPAM...
>
>Greg Amy
>Hartford (CT) Hospital
>

Reply via email to