I have no idea how big the RBL mirror is, but I do know that it takes
about 200 MB to do 1,000,000 DNS queries.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans du Plooy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RBL mirror


On Wednesday 26 May 2004 15:29, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > Also, in terms of bandwidth usage,  how much mail does spamassassin 
> > need to process (and check against DNS and RBL) before mirroring 
> > RBLs locally become economic?  Obviously for our office with 6 
> > people this would be a waste, but I'm considering this for bigger 
> > clients.
>
> Hi,
>
> Anytime you mirror the RBL's locally, you will see a time improvement 
> on processing.
Thanks for your response.  The issue here for me is not really the time
it 
takes, but the bandwidth used.  A lot of our clients run on ADSL
connections.  
ADSL here (in South Africa) have a bandwidth limit of 3gb per month,
after 
which international bandwith is capped (i.e. moved to a 64k line shared
by 
all capped users), rendering it pretty much unusable.

Anything that would save bandwidth is worth looking into.  I just don't
know 
how to calculate or measure how much bandwidth we're using on RBL and
DNS 
checks.  I'm trying to find the point where bandwidth used for DNS and
RBL 
checking for x number of mails is equal to bandwidth used to mirror the 
specified RBLs.

Running DNS locally would of course cut down on bandwidth, regardless
(correct 
me if I'm wrong).  What would be preferable, considering the connection
is 
used for other things as well:  local DNS cache or running bind locally?

Also, it was mentioned that bind needs lots of memory.  Is that true for
a 
dns cache too?  How much?  We usually have at least a dual Xeon with 1gb
RAM 
available.

Thank you
-- 
Kind regards
Hans du Plooy
Newington Consulting Services
hansdp at newingtoncs dot co dot za

*****
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged 
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking 
of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 113

Reply via email to