> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SA 3.0 CVS and SURBL > > At 01:24 PM 6/3/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I did add: > >score URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.0 > > > >to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > > > >I am asking because I sent a test message with this test url > in the body: > > > >http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com.sc.surbl.org > > > >and I do not see it being scored at all. > > Strange.. I've got a working install of SURBL using the > Mail::SpamCopURI module on 2.63, and your message did not > trigger SURBL. I wonder if the dashes are confusing the URI decoding? > > Perhaps > http://test.surbl.org.sc.surbl.org > > would work better? >
I tried that. Same result. I wonder whether SA is even contacting the list. Looking at /var/log/maillog, I do see SURBL is being referred to: Jun 3 14:12:12 sh-umail9 spamd[2210]: result: Y 28 - BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,DCC_CHECK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FORGED_R CVD_HELO,HTML_60_70,HTML_BACKHAIR_4,HTML_BADTAG_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_NONE LEMENT_60_70,HTML_OBFUSCATE_30_40,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET ,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RATWARE_ZERO_TZ,SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,URIBL_BE_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURB L,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=3.7,size=1581,mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,baye s=1,autolearn=spam So it seems to me that this particular message (not the test I sent) is indeed being caught by all 3 lists of SURBL. Is that the correct interpretation ? Lu
