Here is something quick that my co-worker came up with. Of course this
can be improved upon based on what the community wants to see in a logo.

http://www.rhumphrey.com/spamassassin/SpamAssassin.jpg


Richard Humphrey
----------------


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know I risk starting a flamewar, but I am going to say this anyway..  (I
> mean not to insult anyone)
> 
> "SpamAssassin should get a new logo"
> 
> I know SA is one of the best AS products available, and that helps a lot when
> you try to get your company to adopt is as a solution.
> 
> But technical superiority is unfortunately not the only thing that company
> managers look for when selecting a solution.
> Things such as support, having someone to call when things don“t work, price
> and the *feel* of the procuct also play a big role.
> 
> You may think that in the *price* category, no commercial product could
> possibly beat the price of SpamAssassin, but you would be wrong.  I have a
> Excel printout that we got from a Anti-Spam company which compares
> SpamAssassin to their product and shows that SpamAssassin costs around 27,000
> (twenty seven thousand Euros) for the first year in production.
> 
> It doesn“t matter if those calculations are right or not, company managers
> base their decisions on things like this.
> 
> And in the *product feel* category, SpamAssassin realy could do better.  It“s
> embarrassing to say the least that the logo of the product you are trying to
> sell as a solution looks like something right out of Teenage Mutant Ninja
> Turtles.
>   
> IMO, the logo should be completely redesigned to be simpler and more
> "symbolic".  But unfortunately my artistic skills are not up to the task.
> 
>                       - Rķkharšur Egilsson 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Truman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 24 June, 2004 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: new SpamAssassin logo
> 
> 
> Hi,
>   I don't know how to put this without offending someone....but, I've always
> found the existing logos...well "open sourcey", not very 'professional'
> looking. I think it needs to be totally redrawn, make it 'shinier'. For
> example, the clamav logos (www.clamav.net) look really good (mind you, I
> think some graphic designer has produced them).
> 
> just my 1.5 cents...
> 
> Anon...err Scott
> 

Reply via email to