On Saturday, July 17, 2004, 1:47:09 PM, Ralph wrote: RS> I guess it was only a matter of time that spammers started using RS> SnipURL http://snipurl.com/ and the likes of it. Today I received a RS> message from the h*me off*ce d*gest knuckleheads about a "wonderful RS> opportunity", and the shmucks used a SnipURL redirector in their so- RS> called newsletter. Do you think it makes sense add weight for SnipURL RS> to the SpamAssassin core rules?
They have been doing this for a while now w/ tinyurl et al. From the data I've seen working with Message Sniffer it seems that a small to moderate weight might be in order - but it will need to be tested quite a bit - there are many false positives. _M
