On Saturday, July 17, 2004, 7:50:28 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps better, please ask SnipURL to consider using SURBLs >> to deny access to spammers, as the Metamark.net shortening >> redirector service is doing: > Jeff, maybe there should be a SURBL subzone (and bit) for URL shortening > domains. There are too many of services and the potential for abuse is > way too high. Hi Daniel, Are you suggesting a separate list of redirection domains? I don't think there are enough of them to break it out; probably no more than a few dozen. Or are you thinking in terms of special message parsing behavior if a domain is a redirector? BTW I heard back from SnipURL and they seem quite interested in using SURBLs to deny access to their services by spammers. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
