-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey guys --

suggestion: how's about sending out new versions as ZIP files via a
mailing list?  ie. turn it from "pull" into "push"?

if you provide a script, it should be possible to automate something that
users can put into /etc/aliases, then subscribe that address to the "RDJ
list" -- and the updates get auto-installed as they're generated.

It'd also be a handy way to spread the load of HTTP service; each mirror
host has an alias that extracts the files and puts them onto its mirror.

- --j.

Gary Smith writes:
> Damn, didn't know things were going that bad for you guys...  
>  
> I guess all that talk about letting us help you mirror to reduce the load was 
> missed somewhere in the stream of emails.  Anyways, I have my scripts set for:
>  
> 0 6 * * * /root/cronjobs/mailstats.sh
> 45 5 * * *  /etc/mail/spamassassin/my_rules_du_jour.sh
>  
> And I'm still getting the error all weekend.  Rate limited is broken guys...  
>  
> So, yes I can just dump RDJ and copy the files to a central location daily.  
> It's not a problem.  I just think you're going about it in a complety odd 
> way.  Force the wget's to authenticate.  Force rate limiting based on 
> performance and not denial, have a list of active subscribers that aren't 
> rate limited by IP.
>  
> Gary
> 
>  
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 3:13 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [RDJ] Is it broken?
> 
> Gary Smith wrote:
> > Even after the problem has been fixed with RDJ it will just mask the
> > fact that we cannot connect to the server.  Basically, we will never
> > know that it failed because no update occured.
> 
> True, however, in my cron scripts I am alerted of errors or output from any
> script which is run.  If you check the output of those scripts you will see
> when things go bad.
> 
> I'm a member of SARE and I'm all for the ratelimiter.   we spend a great
> deal of time and effort doing our thing and some admins are irresponsible
> enough to set updates for once every 2 minutes.  We have to protect
> ourselves, if people are going to abuse free services (AND YOU KNOW THEY
> WILL) those people providing free services need to find ways to keep
> themselves in business or limit the abusers so it doesn't affect the rest.
> 
> This rate limiter is a wake up call for anyone doing more than 1 update per
> day.  Even if it is 5 seperate servers behind a proxy.  This is free stuff
> you are abusing, please stop abusing it and re-implement your method of
> doing things.  If you know that each of those 4-5 servers will download the
> same files each day, wouldn't it be best to download to a central location
> and then have your servers get it from there?  It seems having all servers
> download straight from us is the lazy approach.  (the same lazy approach
> that causes traffic congestion in all parts of my life), if people car
> pooled more, we would have more room on the roads, if people buy in bulk,
> you don't have to revisit the same stores so often.  If virus writers used
> IRC more often, they would not have to flood the entire internet with port
> scans looking for their zombies.  In my book (and this is not directly
> towards anyone in specific) this is all due to being lazy.  (it's easier to
> flood internet with packets looking for zombies than to have the zombies
> phone home?)  (it's easier if you jump in your own car and drive yourself to
> work versus waiting for someone else)  We often value ease without thinking
> of the consequences of our actions.  For once, we have the ability to force
> people to follow our restrictions and I'll fight to keep it in effect (AS
> SOON AS WE GET THE BUGS WORKED OUT).
> 
> RDJ to an central storage, then you could even have your servers run RDJ on
> that location to check for updates.
> 
> The problem was a few people made such bad mistakes that we have to make
> changes which affect everyone.  We don't like putting limits on things like
> this and if it wasn't to protect our own butts we would not have done it.
> 
> SARE is run by donation from people and businesses combined.  We have a
> business that donated a shell account and bandwidth.  If we abuse the free
> donation, we'll be looking for a new home.  If people setup mirrors, then
> everyone can hammer the mirrors all they want, as long as it doesn't
> threaten our very existance.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFA/F9JQTcbUG5Y7woRAgVaAKDa5l6bvD1OuSVii318yVqjxdULzwCgsGqV
gwCt2bj49AgHmFet5GGEKho=
=8pRW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to