Richard Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What happened to the MISSING_FROM rule, which evidently used to exist? > It doesn't appear in either 2.63 or 2.64. According to RFC2822 a From: is > required. All my searches for a rule of this name related to older > versions of SA. I would add my own rule in the style of MISSING_DATE but I > am concerned that there is a good reason for its absence.
It's gone probably due to low spam hit rate combined with false positives. I don't recall exactly why. RFC 2822 conformance is unfortunately not a good way to tell spam from ham, although spam tends to be MUCH less conformant. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
