At 02:02 PM 8/25/2004, Richard Gilbert wrote:
What happened to the MISSING_FROM rule, which evidently used to exist?

Did it ever exist??

I did a search of my rather comprehensive, but not all inclusive, library of SA versions and did not find it:

$ grep -r MISSING_FROM *
$

$ ls
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.0   Mail-SpamAssassin-2.42  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.43  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.1   Mail-SpamAssassin-2.44  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.11  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.50  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.20  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.51  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.30  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.52  SA3-pre1
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.31  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.53  SA3-pre2
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.40  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.54  SA3-pre3
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.41  Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55  SA3-pre4


Searching the bugzilla also turned up nothing

According to RFC2822 a From: is required.

Yes, and I suspect that most MTA/MDA's will insert one if not present, but I could be wrong here.




Reply via email to