on Sun Jul 29 2007, skip-AT-pobox.com wrote: > Dave> Even training only on mistakes and unsures, I have had a steadily > Dave> increasing ratio for months. I almost never see a misclassified > Dave> ham and only very rarely a ham about which the system is unsure. > Dave> It's unsure about spam every day. > > What are your ham and spam thresholds set to?
The default, whatever that is, for classification. And I've been using -o Categorization:ham_cutoff:0.02 \ -o Categorization:spam_cutoff:0.98 \ when I invoke tte.py > Have you tried lowering your spam threshold a bit? No, I haven't tried that. I suppose I run the risk of a few false positives if I go too far with that? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
