Dave> OK, I have some hams that scored as high as 0.85 I will assert without any further evidence that you have one or more classification mistakes in your database. Can you post the evidence header from that message?
Dave> Is everything between the ham_cutoff and spam_cutoff classified as Dave> unsure? Moving my spam_cutoff to 0.86 probably would make only a Dave> small dent in my results. If everything is properly trained SpamBayes should produce a distribution of scores with a bimodal distribution, hams near 0.0 and spams near 1.0. A ham scoring above 0.5 tells me that you have classified a number of hams as spam. Skip _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html