>> Have you tried lowering your spam threshold a bit? Dave> No, I haven't tried that. I suppose I run the risk of a few false Dave> positives if I go too far with that?
Take a look at the scores in the spams marked unsure and in any hams which are marked unsure. You might well be able to lower the spam threshold a fair amount without running the risk of too many (if any) false positives. I use: [Categorization] ham_cutoff:0.20 spam_cutoff:0.7 Skip _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html