At 09:41 PM 3/23/2002 -0600, you wrote:

>Perhaps the suggestion was that connectivity providers take more of a
>proactive role in dissuading abusive behavior as it enters the public
>network.

Yes, I see the point. However, any steps the ISPs take will have to cost 
money to implement. That cost, just like any other cost, must be passed on 
to the ISPs' subscribers. It is another way in which the cost of spamming 
is shifted away from the sender.

_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
    of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to