On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:26:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Entire?
Yes. Entire. Without cost-shifting, there would be zero spam. At the very worst, there might still be a bulk-mail problem similar to what we have with snailmail -- but without the cost-shifting, I would no longer care. Without the cost-shifting, "remove" lists would be meaningful, because nobody would want to pay to send you stuff you don't want. The *entire* problem with spam is that the marginal cost of sending a spam is Zero. -- Howard Lee Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] Texas licensed Life, Health, Property & Casualty Insurance Agent _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
