"hobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Although this method would probably take care of the 'error-prone' part it seems that > it would make the reporting process even more cumbersome. > > First I would actually have to forward the email to SC, then wait for a reply to come > back from SpamCop, then I would have to open SC's email and click the link. > Lately, every time I've forwarded a spam to SpamCop the reply has shown up in my Yahoo inbox within seconds. Also, when I hit delete, the spam goes to the trash folder and is still there if I need it to forward somewhere else, since I wait until I'm done reading and reporting before I empty the trash folder. I did do a lot of that c&p when Yahoo was being slow about delivering the auto-response from SC. Forwarding is usually easier IME, YMMV. > Then *IF* one of the recipients was someone like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I > would have to go back to the original spam to actually forward it to the abuse > department instead of only 'dev_null' getting the report. Since I normally delete > spam emails immediately after reporting them it also means I would have to keep them > in my mailbox and figure out later which have been reported (thus ready to be > deleted) and which haven't yet been processed (either needing to be sent to SC or > awaiting a response from SC). _______________________________________________ SpamCop-Help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
