"Anne M. Marble" wrote:
> Heidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's bad enough that we have to get it, bad enough that most of it is now
> in
> > HTML, but why do they have to make it so damn UGLY?? I got one this
> > morning, neon, poisonous shades of yellow, orange and black. Is the aim
> to
> > entice customers or make them sick?
>
> I've noticed that about HTML spam, too. Maybe they've got a deal with
> people spewing medical spam. If they make you feel dizzy with bad HTML
> spam, then you might be more likely to order pills from some scam artist.
>
> I also see a lot of HTML spam with coding that comes out of FrontPage or
> similar programs. I don't blame people for using FrontPage to design some
> HTML -- but could you at least take out the extra tags?
I wouldn't care for buying anything from a spam that looks like a carnival
ride. :-p
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list
