On Sun, 6 May 2001 01:03:38 +0100, "michael lefevre"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Heidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>9d0uar$u2o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9d0uar$u2o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> It's bad enough that we have to get it, bad enough that most of it is now
>in
>> HTML, but why do they have to make it so damn UGLY??  I got one this
>> morning, neon, poisonous shades of yellow, orange and black.  Is the aim
>to
>> entice customers or make them sick?
>
>i got another one which played music at me this morning... that annoyed me
>early in the morning, so i went to the effort of following the links and
>reporting the secondary web pages as well (which i should do all the time,
>but don't always...)
>
>(yes, i realise if i used a decent email client, it wouldn't play the
>embedded music...)

  So why do you use VTP, aka Lookout, aka Outlook? Seriously, what are
the benefits? I'm not trying to be a smartass, really, I'm just
curious.

  It seems thread drift has rendered the following question somewhat
on topic, so here goes. I recently installed IE 5.5. It seems that I
can't allow Javascript stuff without also allowing Active X and
VBscript stuff. Is that true?

              Joe
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list

Reply via email to