There is that... I will make the downgrade... tks!
2008/10/14 Erald Troja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > I second your findings. > > We reverted to 4.0.4 right away. > Did not report it as we were unable > to find a good explanation for it. > > The spamdyke processes were just lingering each consuming > between 70% to 100% of CPU. > > > > > ------------------------ > Erald Troja > > > Paulo Henrique wrote: >> Hi, >> since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working >> with a high load, the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5, >> someone noticed this problem? What may be happening? >> >> tks > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > -- "Muitos homens perdem a saúde para ganhar dinheiro, depois perdem o dinheiro para ganhar a saúde. - Confúcio" Paulo Henrique Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
