Hi... 2008/10/14 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is the first I've heard of this -- can you provide any more > information about it? Did those spamdyke processes produce any log > messages or errors?
No errors. Did they begin eating the CPU before or after > accepting/rejecting a message? Apparently once the message is accepted. Did you try turning on full logging to > see exactly what was going on? Yet I did not. What OS are you running? Linux Slackware 12.1, kernel 2.6.24-5-smp tks. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Erald Troja wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I second your findings. >> >> We reverted to 4.0.4 right away. >> Did not report it as we were unable >> to find a good explanation for it. >> >> The spamdyke processes were just lingering each consuming >> between 70% to 100% of CPU. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------ >> Erald Troja >> >> >> Paulo Henrique wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working >>> with a high load, the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5, >>> someone noticed this problem? What may be happening? >>> >>> tks >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >> > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > -- "Muitos homens perdem a saúde para ganhar dinheiro, depois perdem o dinheiro para ganhar a saúde. - Confúcio" Paulo Henrique Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
