0x800CCC0F means CONNECTION_DROPPED

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813514/en-us

In most cases my customers had a virus scanner dropping the connection.

Paulo Henrique schrieb:
One of my customers reported a problem like this, he could not send a
message of 23MB.

Outlook Express View the error code: 0x800ccc0f



2008/10/15 Arthur Girardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Sam,

Will that also solve the issue of smtp errors on the client-side? I
couldn't find any log for those customers who had those errors, not
even in the syslog. I did copy the error tho, if that may be of any
help. Can reproduce that anytime too.

And just to correct myself earlier, its not chunks of excessive
output, but always the same line:

EXCESSIVE(process_config_file()@configuration.c:3610): set
configuration option full-log-dir from file /etc/spamdyke.conf, line
69: /path/to/spamdyke/full-log-dir

This being the server's reply in the error message at client side.

Arthur

Citando Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I think I may have this one solved.  I removed some code in version
4.0.5 that I didn't think was necessary any longer, but it turns out I
wrote it for version 3.1.2 to prevent exactly this problem.  Go figure.

I've reverted that change and I'm running the test scripts now.  If
everything checks out I'll release 4.0.6 in the morning.

-- Sam Clippinger

Arthur Girardi wrote:
Hi

I too noticed the high cpu usage by spamdyke in the 4.0.5 version.
Like 6 or 7 spamdyke processes running at 100% cpu on a dual
quad-core...

Interesting enough, I noticed not all spamdyke did go 100%, only those
that had some kind of attachment, a gif, jpg, a signature, whatever,
encoded in base64. The message does finish successfully and life goes
on, but I started having some slowdown complaints, and after this
first post to the list, I saw I had the same issue.

If you strace the process while it is hanging at high cpu, you'll see
a lot of Timeouts mixed with reads and writes of what seems to be the
content of the base64 attachment.

Then I tried changing output from my normal verbose operation to
excessive, and enabled full-log-dir, but just as I did that, cpu usage
fell down, and clients started getting smtp error messages containing
chunks of spamdyke's excessive output.

I'm running spamdyke on a rhel5.

Cheers

Arthur

Citando Paulo Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Hi...

2008/10/14 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

This is the first I've heard of this -- can you provide any more
information about it?  Did those spamdyke processes produce any log
messages or errors?

No errors.


  Did they begin eating the CPU before or after

accepting/rejecting a message?

Apparently once the message is accepted.


 Did you try turning on full logging to

see exactly what was going on?

Yet I did not.

  What OS are you running?

Linux Slackware 12.1, kernel 2.6.24-5-smp


tks.

-- Sam Clippinger

Erald Troja wrote:

Hello,

I second your findings.

We reverted to 4.0.4 right away.
Did not report it as we were unable
to find a good explanation for it.

The spamdyke processes were just lingering each consuming
between 70% to 100% of CPU.




------------------------
Erald Troja


Paulo Henrique wrote:


Hi,
since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working
with a high load,  the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5,
someone noticed this problem? What may be happening?

tks


_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


--
"Muitos homens perdem a saúde para ganhar dinheiro, depois perdem o
dinheiro para ganhar a saúde. - Confúcio"

Paulo Henrique Fonseca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users





_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to