It's not a "Flaw" in Spamdyke, because the People that uses Qmail but not Spamdyke had the same kind of problems, you can check on the qmr forum and see that was not a Spamdyke Problem.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Michael Colvin <[email protected]>wrote: > As a side note on this thread... > > I've not applied the patch on my boxes yes, just haven't had the time. > I've > just run the script that was provided every couple days, and that cleared > the hung process. > > However, I have noticed something interesting. I used to have to run it > every couple days. Since this patch came out, I'm not having any hung > processes, or very few. I'm looking at MRTG graphs of SMTP processes, > which > use to grow pretty regularly, but over the last two weeks, they've stopped. > > It makes me wonder if this wasn't either something the spammers had figured > out was a "Flaw" in Spamdyke, and were exploiting it, or if whoever was > doing it simply got banned/dropped, or got a life. > > Anyway, I'll apply the patch when I get a chance, just thought it was > interesting that the "Need" for the patch seems to have passed.... > > > Michael J. Colvin > NorCal Internet Services > www.norcalisp.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:spamdyke-users- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Hartmut Wernisch > > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:09 AM > > To: spamdyke users > > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung processes > > > > On 22 Mar 10, Mirko Buffoni wrote: > > > At 13.10 19/03/2010 +0100, you wrote: > > > >At 13.39 19/03/2010 +1100, you wrote: > > > > >On 19/03/2010 07:15, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > Started a new thread for this improved patch. This should fix the > > > > > > SSL_accept, SSL_shutdown and SSL_read issues. It temporarily sets > > the > > > > > > socket to non-blocking and timesout after the configured time. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a replacement for the previous patch, apply to a clean > > > > > > spamdyke-4.0.10 code base. > > > > > > > >So far, with the new patch, no sign of hung or defunct processes has > > been > > > >noticed. > > > >I also shortened the default qmail timeoutsmtpd to 600 (10 minutes) > > > >Survived a good amount of spam in the 11:00-12:00 time range. > > > >Good sign. > > > > > > After 3 days and several spam storms (that can be seen from collected > > > statistics) > > > no hanged up spamdyke process, nor defunct qmail-smtpd process have > been > > > noticed. > > > IMO, I'd say your latest patch is stable enough to be included in the > > > official trunk > > > since it corrected a very annoying behavior. > > > > > > Thank you for your support, Trog. > > > > yes me too. no more idle spamdyke processes or defunc qmail process > > since using this patch. > > > > best, > > Hartmut Wernisch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spamdyke-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
