Actually, very soon now.  I'm very close to releasing a new version that 
includes this fix and a bunch of others (but does not, sadly, include 
recipient validation).  I have two more small changes to make and test, 
then I'll be ready to send out a beta version.  I'd really like help 
testing this one, as the nonblocking I/O /may/ cause some other errors, 
though I believe I've got them handled.

-- Sam Clippinger

On 6/7/10 8:08 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Hartmut Wernisch wrote:
>    
>> On 22 Mar 10, Mirko Buffoni wrote:
>>      
>>> At 13.10 19/03/2010 +0100, you wrote:
>>>        
>>>> At 13.39 19/03/2010 +1100, you wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> On 19/03/2010 07:15, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Started a new thread for this improved patch. This should fix the
>>>>>> SSL_accept, SSL_shutdown and SSL_read issues. It temporarily sets the
>>>>>> socket to non-blocking and timesout after the configured time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a replacement for the previous patch, apply to a clean
>>>>>> spamdyke-4.0.10 code base.
>>>>>>              
>>>> So far, with the new patch, no sign of hung or defunct processes has been
>>>> noticed.
>>>> I also shortened the default qmail timeoutsmtpd to 600 (10 minutes)
>>>> Survived a good amount of spam in the 11:00-12:00 time range.
>>>> Good sign.
>>>>          
>>> After 3 days and several spam storms (that can be seen from collected
>>> statistics)
>>> no hanged up spamdyke process, nor defunct qmail-smtpd process have been
>>> noticed.
>>> IMO, I'd say your latest patch is stable enough to be included in the
>>> official trunk
>>> since it corrected a very annoying behavior.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your support, Trog.
>>>        
>> yes me too. no more idle spamdyke processes or defunc qmail process
>> since using this patch.
>>
>> best,
>> Hartmut Wernisch
>>      
> Sam,
> Any guess as to when this patch will be rolled into the next version?
> Many thanks.
>
>    
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to