And it seems that in this portion (resyncing... after logging out and back in and resetting the sync): Aug 12 15:08:20 -- Changed calendar event: Daylight Saving Time Begins @ 2002-04-07 00:00 Aug 12 15:08:20 -- Added calendar event: Daylight Saving Time Begins @ 2002-04-07 00:00 Aug 12 15:08:20 -- *** addSubrecordToOwners returned an error: Error Domain=SpanningSyncErrorDomain Code=0 "Operation could not be completed. (SpanningSyncErrorDomain error 0.)" Aug 12 15:08:20 -- *** addSubrecordToOwners returned an error: Error Domain=SpanningSyncErrorDomain Code=0 "Operation could not be completed. (SpanningSyncErrorDomain error 0.)" Aug 12 15:09:05 -- Sending data to Google... Aug 12 15:09:14 -- ...done Aug 12 15:09:14 -- *** The server reported failed records three times in a row. Reverting to normal schedule. Aug 12 15:09:14 -- *** The server reported failed records three times in a row. Reverting to normal schedule. Aug 12 15:09:14 -- *** The server reported failed records three times in a row. Reverting to normal schedule. Aug 12 15:09:15 -- Sync complete
On Aug 12, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Charlie Wood wrote: > > We've isolated the problem--it affects users only once, but > unfortunately it's during the first sync after upgrading from v2.1.3 > to v3.0. I've created a fix and we're testing it now. It should be > deployed to the live servers soon. I apologize for the inconvenience > this bug has caused. > > Thanks, > Charlie > > > > On Aug 12, 11:02 am, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: >> Luckily, I took a backup before the upgrade. To fix the problem, I >> re- >> imported Address Book data from my backup and then re-wrote all of my >> data on Google. The lame part about that is that my chat contact >> list >> got wiped out as a result. Better than nothing, I guess. >> >> It definitely looks to me like Spanning Sync 3.0 was released a bit >> prematurely... >> >> Brian >> >> On Aug 11, 4:51 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello, >> >>> I just noticed that all of my contacts in Address Book are now >>> duplicated after the Spanning Sync 3.0 upgrade today. Is this >>> Spanning Sync's sly way of trying to get me to buy spanning >>> tools? :P >> >>> Seriously, though, why would this happen? It looks like my contacts >>> with birthdays have a birthday in one contact, but not in the other. >>> Contacts without birthdays are just purely duplicated. >> >>> Google Contacts does not seem to have this same duplication, so it >>> appears isolated to Address Book. >> >>> Please help!! >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Brian > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
