I've just done a quick comparison of the speeds of various XSLT processors for transforming .prot.xml to html. There is a marked difference between the processors, and xsltproc which is the TPP default is not the quickest.
Tests performed on Ubuntu 9.0x 64-bit on a DELL R600 Dual Xeon 5500 32GB RAM. All processors are installed from their Ubuntu packages. Input document was a large 200Mb .prot.xml file resulting from OMSSA search of the 72-run MaxQuant dataset downloaded from ProteomeCommons: xsltproc - 1011.96s xalan - 1206.95 saxon-xslt - 491.95s saxonb-xslt - 132.19s saxonb-xslt works for me as a direct replacement for xsltproc in the $xsltproc definition in protxml2html.pl I've not tried the commercial Saxon-SA / Saxon-EE from Saxonica.com, but they are supposedly faster still. DT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
