Have obtained a Saxon-EE evaluation to try it. Same .prot.xml file, same server - 35.04s (3.5% of the xsltproc run-time). Down side is that it costs 300 GBP per server.
DT On Dec 2, 10:45 am, dctrud <[email protected]> wrote: > I've just done a quick comparison of the speeds of various XSLT > processors for transforming .prot.xml to html. There is a marked > difference between the processors, and xsltproc which is the TPP > default is not the quickest. > > Tests performed on Ubuntu 9.0x 64-bit on a DELL R600 Dual Xeon 5500 > 32GB RAM. All processors are installed from their Ubuntu packages. > Input document was a large 200Mb .prot.xml file resulting from OMSSA > search of the 72-run MaxQuant dataset downloaded from ProteomeCommons: > > xsltproc - 1011.96s > xalan - 1206.95 > saxon-xslt - 491.95s > saxonb-xslt - 132.19s > > saxonb-xslt works for me as a direct replacement for xsltproc in the > $xsltproc definition in protxml2html.pl > > I've not tried the commercial Saxon-SA / Saxon-EE from Saxonica.com, > but they are supposedly faster still. > > DT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
