Brian,
Yup. I just discovered this too, as per other post. On our servers it's
not disk-bound, as the 1.6GB .pep.xml is fully cached, but the continued
rpeated slows things down.
R.E. solutions for this, is Boost code welcomed in the main TPP tools? I
think I can re-write using a single pass parse of the .pep.xml into a
Boost.MultiIndex hash of structs/classes containing the required peptide
info.
DT
Brian Pratt wrote:
Looking at the code I can see where this would easily become diskbound
for large data sets - it reads and rereads the same pepXML files
repeatedly, but the effect is probably masked by disk cacheing up to a
certain point. Somebody would need to write some logic for cacheing
the file contents to speed this up properly.
Brian
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jake W <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've seen the same thing. On datasets where
ASAPRatioPeptideRatioParser completes in a few minutes,
ASAPRatioProteinRatioParser can take an hour or so. This is on a
Windows machine running TPP ver. 4.3.0.
Jake
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:spctools-discuss%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.