Brian,

Yup. I just discovered this too, as per other post. On our servers it's not disk-bound, as the 1.6GB .pep.xml is fully cached, but the continued rpeated slows things down.

R.E. solutions for this, is Boost code welcomed in the main TPP tools? I think I can re-write using a single pass parse of the .pep.xml into a Boost.MultiIndex hash of structs/classes containing the required peptide info.

DT

Brian Pratt wrote:
Looking at the code I can see where this would easily become diskbound for large data sets - it reads and rereads the same pepXML files repeatedly, but the effect is probably masked by disk cacheing up to a certain point. Somebody would need to write some logic for cacheing the file contents to speed this up properly. Brian

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jake W <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I've seen the same thing.  On datasets where
    ASAPRatioPeptideRatioParser completes in a few minutes,
    ASAPRatioProteinRatioParser can take an hour or so.  This is on a
    Windows machine running TPP ver. 4.3.0.

    Jake

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:spctools-discuss%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to