Hi Dave, Brian,

Just jumping into comment on Boost. Yes, it is welcomed and in fact already used in the TPP (as well as the TPP-included ProteoWizard project); however, because the Boost API and process of building Boost libraries have not been particularly stable, we've found it necessary to fix the version of Boost that we work with. Our current version is 1.39.0. As long as you can test against that, you're contributes would be fine-- and no doubt very welcomed.

-Natalie


On 2/4/10 2:26 PM, Dave Trudgian wrote:
Brian,

Yup. I just discovered this too, as per other post. On our servers it's not disk-bound, as the 1.6GB .pep.xml is fully cached, but the continued rpeated slows things down.

R.E. solutions for this, is Boost code welcomed in the main TPP tools? I think I can re-write using a single pass parse of the .pep.xml into a Boost.MultiIndex hash of structs/classes containing the required peptide info.

DT

Brian Pratt wrote:
Looking at the code I can see where this would easily become diskbound for large data sets - it reads and rereads the same pepXML files repeatedly, but the effect is probably masked by disk cacheing up to a certain point. Somebody would need to write some logic for cacheing the file contents to speed this up properly.

Brian

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jake W <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I've seen the same thing.  On datasets where
    ASAPRatioPeptideRatioParser completes in a few minutes,
    ASAPRatioProteinRatioParser can take an hour or so.  This is on a
    Windows machine running TPP ver. 4.3.0.

    Jake

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
<mailto:spctools-discuss%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to