Hi Josh, Sure thing, why don't you go ahead and add something like a NOMODELS (or whatever you want to call it) option to ProteinProphet usage? We'll be happy to incorporate it into the code. Cheers, --Luis
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Josh Eckels <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working to adopt a new build of the TPP for LabKey Server. It looks > like that TPP 4.6.2 added tpp_models.pl to the xinteract workflow. It > appears to be conditionally executed as part of PeptideProphet execution > (it's wrapped in a check for getIsInteractiveMode()), but always invoked > for ProteinProphet. For our usage, it would be great to have both usages > conditionalized, so that we don't introduce a dependency on Perl. > > Is this something that might be considered? I'd be happy to submit a patch. > > Thanks, > Josh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spctools-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
