Hi Ali,

Are you setting your instrument to collect only 2+ and 3+ data?  Are you
using the tandem bundled with TPP or the GPM version of tandem?  Have you
tried to process all your runs in one file?

Thanks,
-David


On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ali <sma.banijam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you very much! I really appreciate it!
>
> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 8:03:27 PM UTC-4, David Shteynberg wrote:
>>
>> PeptideProphet is doing it's job here by telling you that there is no
>> distinct population of correct results in this search.  I suspect your
>> search parameters are the problem.  This is orbitrap data so the charges
>> should be known, but it seems Tandem only searched 2+ and 3+ for you,  this
>> is somewhat troubling.  Tomorrow, I will check your parameters more
>> carefully to try to identify the actual problem with your search.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ali <sma.ban...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It appears that PeptideProphet fails, I am getting this message:
>>>
>>> using Accurate Mass Bins
>>> using PPM mass difference
>>>  (X! Tandem) (minprob 0)
>>> adding Accurate Mass mixture distr
>>> init with X! Tandem trypsin
>>> MS Instrument info: Manufacturer: Thermo Scientific, Model: UNKNOWN,
>>> Ionization: nanoelectrospray, Analyzer: orbitrap, Detector: inductive
>>> detector
>>>
>>>  PeptideProphet  (TPP v4.8.0 PHILAE, Build 201608051257-exported
>>> (RedHatEnterpriseServer-x86_64)) AKeller@ISB
>>>  read in 0 1+, 14418 2+, 11080 3+, 0 4+, 0 5+, 0 6+, and 0 7+ spectra.
>>> Initialising statistical models ...
>>> negmean = 0.0533258
>>> negmean = 1
>>> negmean = 0.0376944
>>> negmean = -0.2
>>> negmean = -0.2
>>> negmean = -0.2
>>> negmean = -0.2
>>> Iterations: .........10.........20.
>>> WARNING: Mixture model quality test failed for charge (2+).
>>> WARNING: Mixture model quality test failed for charge (3+).
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 5:57:39 PM UTC-4, David Shteynberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I highly recommend you start employing decoys in your search
>>>> databases.  I noticed you are not combining together the runs in the
>>>> analysis.  If the data was generated and searched in the same way it should
>>>> be analysed together for better statistical power.  I suggest you combine
>>>> the results from all your runs and filter by the spectrum names later.  Try
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> InteractParser ./ALL.interact.xml ./*.tandem.pep.xml -S -Etrypsin
>>>> PeptideProphetParser ./ALL.interact.xml ACCMASS PPM NOICAT MINPROB=0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ali <sma.ban...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi David
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your reply. I don't think so, it is not just one set, as I
>>>>> said almost a third of my search results are returned with zero
>>>>> probabilities. All of the searches are done with the same setting and 
>>>>> using
>>>>> the same database. The fact that for some of the searched files I am
>>>>> getting zero probabilities and some of them are just fine is a bit 
>>>>> strange.
>>>>> I don't have decoys in my data base. If it helps, I can send you one of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> search results with or without PeptideProphet probabilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Ali
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 4:19:05 PM UTC-4, David Shteynberg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible there are no correct results in that set?  Common
>>>>>> pitfalls are incorrect search parameters (e.g. wrong mods enabled or
>>>>>> disabled) and wrong database.  If you have decoys in your database these
>>>>>> can be utilized for a more accurate mixture model generation using 
>>>>>> options
>>>>>> "DECOY=<your decoy prefix>  DECOYPROBS NONPARAM" in additions to the
>>>>>> options you already have enabled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Ali <sma.ban...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using PeptideProphet on my X!Tandem search results. There are
>>>>>>> ~150 experiments and PeptideProphet works fine on most of them but for 
>>>>>>> ~50
>>>>>>> experiments, PeptideProphet returns zero probability for all of the
>>>>>>> peptides. Can some one please tell me what might be the issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *More Info:*
>>>>>>> I am using TPP v4.8 on Linux. PeptideProphet does not show an error
>>>>>>> when it produces zero probability for all of the search results.
>>>>>>> This is what I'm doing:
>>>>>>> -search with X!Tandem
>>>>>>> -Tandem2XML ./100.tandem.xml ./100.tandem.pep.xml
>>>>>>> -InteractParser ./100.interact.xml ./100.tandem.pep.xml -S -Etrypsin
>>>>>>> -PeptideProphetParser ./100.interact.xml ACCMASS PPM NOICAT MINPROB=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>>>>> *Ali*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to