Hi Alejandro,

You can download the updated Xpress and interfaces from our dev staging
site:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/sashimi/files/Trans-Proteomic%20Pipeline%20%28TPP%29/TPP%20v0.0%20%28Development%29/

Unzip XpressIntensityUpdate.zip, and place XPressPeptideParser.exe under
the C:\TPP\bin\ directory, and the other 2 files under C:\TPP\cgi-bin\ (or
wherever you installed TPP).  I also recommend making backups of the
original files in case you need them.

Cheers,
--Luis


On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Alejandro <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Luis,
>
> Oh good to hear that it is already solved. If I could have a windows
> binary would be really useful.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alejandro
>
> On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 8:06:25 PM UTC+1, Luis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alejandro,
>>
>> The misreported intensity ratios was a bug when using the -L or -H
>> options in XPRESS.  We have fixed this, as well as added support for those
>> fields in PepXMLViewer and Petunia.  If you are building from sources,
>> simply build revision 7683, or let us know if you would like Windows
>> binaries.  This will also be in the next official release of TPP.
>>
>> Thanks for reporting this, and for the positive feedback on 5.1!
>> --Luis
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Alejandro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> Yes, I would be really interested in testing it out as soon as you have
>>> a pre-release!
>>>
>>> I haven't checked if thats also the case with an older version, I should
>>> have a computer running 4.8. I will check it out and see.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info on the tag, I will try to then find the mod tag.
>>>
>>> BTW, great release with the 5.1, so far I have found it quite good to
>>> work with.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 4:07:04 AM UTC+1, Luis wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Alejandro,
>>>>
>>>> We will add these columns to the PepXMLViewer for the next release; I
>>>> can let you know when we have a pre-release version if you would be
>>>> interested in testing it.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure why the ratios are not being correctly calculated; we
>>>> will have a look and try to fix as well for the next release.  Did you also
>>>> have trouble with this feature with the previous version of TPP?
>>>>
>>>> As you noted, modified peptide masses are rounded when reported in the
>>>> modified_peptide attribute of protXML in order save space and for making
>>>> the display simpler.  You can find the full modification masses within the
>>>> mod_aminoacid_mas tags within modification_info.  Or just round the pepXML
>>>> masses when comparing peptides.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> --Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Alejandro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been running since a while the 5.1 release candidate and since
>>>>> a week or so the new 5.1 release with great success thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Lately I have been running more the TPP tools from the command-line
>>>>> and came across the option in XPRESS to export intensities as well as
>>>>> intensity based ratios of labeled type of data. I have used it but I don't
>>>>> see the option in Petunia in the Pepxml viewer to add it to the table. By
>>>>> manual inspection of the Pepxml, file I see them reported within the 
>>>>> xpress
>>>>> tag, although the ratio is always reported as 0.000, even though the
>>>>> intensities are reported, and by manually calculating in some peptides it
>>>>> seems quite close to the ratio calculated from the areas, as expected. Is
>>>>> there an option to parse those out when exporting the tsv file? Moreover
>>>>> have you have some experience on using the intensities as input for the
>>>>> protein ratio/abundance calculation? I tried to see if I could build it it
>>>>> up using the intensities but the peptides are annotated different in the
>>>>> Pepxml, than in the Protxml. All modifications are annotated either with
>>>>> the more precise mass shift or rounded. e.g CAM is reported as C[160.03]
>>>>> for the peptides in the Pepxml whereas as C[160] for in Protxml.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another question that I have related to xpress is if you have any
>>>>> experience on better settings for data analyzed on hi-res MS, ie. Q
>>>>> Exactive. Fixed elution peaks, number of chromatograms points, or number 
>>>>> of
>>>>> 13C isotopic peaks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to