On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:51:45PM -0400, Wheeler, David A wrote:
> But in that case, I think there needs to be a *speedy* assignment
> (hah!) of a SPDX license id/expression to the React.js license.

There's some previous discussion of that license in [1,2].


[1]: https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292
     Subject: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression
       for a project with an additional patent license?
     Date: Mon Jun 15 03:58:53 UTC 2015
[2]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-June/002008.html
     Subject: New OSI approved license
     Date: Sun Jun 4 03:47:02 UTC 2017

This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Spdx-legal mailing list

Reply via email to