Philippe>So please Philippe>do not start to try to infer versions, relations and other things Philippe>based on identifier strings
+1 Philippe>For instance you could track that ... Philippe>next version is ... and so on. But this becomes an explicitly Philippe>stored relationship and not something vaguely inferred from opaque Philippe>ids. +1 I guess we might want include at least some relationships into the standard. Philippe>And in the same way, the -only and -or-later suffixes applied to some Philippe>ids have no meaning whatsoever of their own Even though currently "-or-later" is an opaque string, it looks like it might make sense to add "only this version" modifier to "spdx expressions". What do you think? How could it look like? EPL-1.0 ONLY EPL-1.0-only The second option is not that bad in my opinion. Vladimir -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3736): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3736 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/32049933/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
