Vladimir> I'm sure one should not specify "Bundle-License: CC-BY-SA-2.0"
and overrule it for "just 2.0" at the same time.
David>That is *EXACTLY* what the Linux kernel and Busybox do - they take
the GPL 2.0 license and say

David, I'm afraid your example does not work here.
I asked an example for CC-BY-SA-2.0 license, and you provide example with
GPL. That is a completely different story. Really.
Could you please provide an example for CC-BY-SA-2.0? (or later version of
that license)

Some context:
There's a page https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/later-version-clauses
It has "allows only"=="n" for CC-BY-SA. Which means one cannot use
CC-BY-SA-2.0 and overrule it for "just 2.0" at the same time.

Your move.

Vladimir

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3737): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3737
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/32049933/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to