On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 12:10 -0600, William Bartholomew wrote:
> Ignore the content, a lot of it needs to be updated based on the text
> in
> 2.2 and ongoing 3.0 discussions but this is an example of how the
> specification could be restructured based on profiles:
>
> https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/2-base-profile/
> <https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/2-base-profile/>
>
> https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/3-licensing-profile/
> <https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/3-licensing-profile/>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any feedback, good or bad :)

YAML? JSON? Yay! \0/

Jeremiah

________________________________

This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They 
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. 
Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3818): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3818
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/69985465/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to