+1 -- I like the look and formatting of this, I think it lays things out very cleanly. Thanks William!
Minor comment, looking at the Base Profile example: I expect it'll be useful to ensure that each of the metadata elements (e.g. SPDX Version, etc.) has its own outline sub-number, for ease of reference. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:15 PM Kate Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi William, > Like the way you're structuring the section and the look of it. :-) > > Kate > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:10 PM William Bartholomew < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Ignore the content, a lot of it needs to be updated based on the text in >> 2.2 and ongoing 3.0 discussions but this is an example of how the >> specification could be restructured based on profiles: >> >> https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/2-base-profile/ >> <https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/2-base-profile/> >> >> https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/3-licensing-profile/ >> <https://iamwillbar.github.io/spdx-spec/3-licensing-profile/> >> >> >> Please let me know if you have any feedback, good or bad :) >> >> William Bartholomew >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Steve Winslow Director of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation [email protected] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3821): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3821 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/69985465/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
