Hi Marc-Etienne,
You are correct – the “+” operator is still valid. Gary From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 11:01 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <[email protected]> Subject: [spdx-tech] SPDX in Wikipedia Hello, In the SPDX page on the English Wikipedia: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange You can read the following: Deprecated syntax[ <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_Package_Data_Exchange&action=edit§ion=3> edit] Starting version 2.0, it is no longer valid to use the + operator in a license identifier. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange#cite_note-10> [10] By removing this syntax, it left an undefined state for licenses accepting the current version and those after it, such as the GPL. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange#cite_note-11> [11] It was valid to use GPL-3.0-or-later, but it wasn't explicitly written in the specifications. This was fixed later with version 2.2. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange#cite_note-12> [12] >From my reading of the current SPDX 2.2, I consider this is wrong. It is only >identifiers like GPL-2.0+ that are deprecated, but the “+” operator can still >be applied to licences. Can you please confirm so that I can update the Wikipedia page? Best regards, Marc-Etienne Vargenau -- Marc-Etienne Vargenau [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Nokia, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4055): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4055 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/82584261/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
